Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Gibbons v. Lynch
as 15-1879
Petitioner:
JEROME PHILLIP GIBBONS
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, Attorney General
Gibbons v. Fresenius USA Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11026
Plaintiff:
Katrina Gibbons
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing , Inc, Fresenius USA Marketing , Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibbons v. Holder
as 15-1206
Petitioner:
JEROME PHILLIP GIBBONS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Jacobs v. Feeney et al
as 1:2014cv14741
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jacobs
Defendant:
Joan Feeney, M. Page Kelley, Leo Sorokin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jacobs v. Hotchkiss et al
as 1:2014cv14747
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jacobs
Defendant:
Allison Hotchkiss, John Gibbons and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gibbons et al v. Titan Fire Protection, Inc.
as 1:2014cv11795
Plaintiff:
Peter Gibbons , C.J. Cahill , Sprinkler Fitters Local 550 Annuity Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Titan Fire Protection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Gibbons v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10085
Plaintiff:
Jerry Gibbons
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc., Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc. dba Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hilton v. Kerry, et al
as 13-2444
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALEXANDER HILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN GIBBONS, United States Marshal, District of Massachusetts, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General and JOHN F. KERRY, United States Secretary of State
Hilton
as 1:2013cv11710
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hilton
Defendant:
John Kerry, John Gibbons and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
