Cases 21 - 30 of 9,455
US v. Griffin
as 24-1541
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DANIEL J. GRIFFIN
Interested Party:
US DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
US v. Griffin
as 24-1540
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DANIEL J. GRIFFIN
Interested Party:
US DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Mann, et al v. Cottrell, et al
as 24-1555
Plaintiff:
JASBIR MANN, ROSEMARY COTE, RANDY J. SPENCER and others
Defendant:
JONATHAN COTTRELL, REBECCA COTTRELL and MICHAEL BERNIER
Duarte v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1543
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, PATRICK W. MCDERMOTT, Sheriff, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, DANIELLE FRANE, Superintendent, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and others
In Re Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2024cv11470
Plaintiff:
Judith M. Soderberg, Ray Peleckas, Michigan Laborers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cedric Francois, Federico Grossi and others
Petitioner:
Teddy J. Kasnicki and Kristen Bernard-Hedgespeth
Johnson v. Brill et al
as 1:2024cv11459
Plaintiff:
Jobari J Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt Brill, Lt Russo, C.O Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Marshall v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11431
Plaintiff:
Robert E Marshall and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Reyes-Rosario
as 24-1504
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CARLOS J. REYES-ROSARIO, a/k/a Carlitos Mea, a/k/a El Mea, a/k/a Apestoso
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
