Cases 21 - 30 of 1,171
Brown v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10917
Plaintiff:
Scotty Brown
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brown v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 1:2023cv13205
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Brown
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and BANK OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
BILL P BROWN and SUSAN E BROWN
Interested Party:
UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS and CACV OF COLORADO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brown v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 1:2023cv13053
Plaintiff:
Donald L Brown
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Brown v. The Sherwin Williams Company
as 1:2024cv10313
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Brown, III
Defendant:
The Sherwin Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Kimber Super Carry CSTM pistol et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kimber Super Carry CSTM pistol, Big Horn Armory, Inc. AR-500 rifle, Browning A-Bolt rifle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924 Firearms Penalties
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PEASLEE v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DIANNE V PEASLEE
Defendant:
DARRYL BROWN, SR, DARRYL BROWN, JR and BROWN'S EXIT 27 SALVAGE
Sanders v. Renaud et al
as 1:2024cv10165
Plaintiff:
Devon Sanders
Defendant:
Cheryl A. Renaud, Krystle Brown, Amy Boncher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
