Cases 21 - 30 of 567
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Medina v. Atwood et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Edgar Medina
Defendant:
Richard Atwood, Kelley McKiernan, Zachary Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Medina Group, LLC v. Design Build, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01160
Plaintiff:
Medina Group, LLC
Defendant:
Design Build, LLC and Carmelo Grau-De Leon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Osuji et al v. Canino et al
as 3:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Chinyere Adaaku Osuji, Ralph Cazenave and Minor MOB
Defendant:
Jeanette Canino, Milagros Rivera, Milane Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lugo-Medina v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Hilton Lugo-Medina
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., A, B & C Insurance Companies, JOHN AND JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Diaz-O'Neill v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, et al
as 23-1127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAIME A. DIAZ-O'NEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT & SEWER AUTHORITY, RAQUEL MATOS-ROLON, GLORIMAR CHICLANA-OCACIO and others
Perez Medina v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00052
Petitioner:
Medina Elvio and Elvio Perez Medina
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Medina v. Holliston Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv30163
Plaintiff:
Miguel Medina
Defendant:
Holliston Police Department, Officer Charrete and Office Avey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Roman-Medina
as 22-1927
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROMAN-MEDINA, a/k/a Keke, a/k/a Cristopher Roman-Medina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
