Cases 21 - 30 of 231
Nunez Perez v. Escobar Pabon, et al
as 22-1749
Petitioner:
DAVID NUNEZ-PEREZ and DAVID NUNEZ PEREZ
Respondent:
HECTOR HERNANDEZ-MORALES, Warden, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, ANA I. ESCOBAR, Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and others
Soto-Nunez v. US Drug Enforcement Admin. Forfeiture Counsel
as 22-1679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VILEIKA SOTO-NUNEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
US DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Rizzuti et al v. Cappabianca Jr et al
as 4:2022cv40094
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Rizzuti, Joseph J Rizzuti Jr., Karissa M Rizzuti and others
Defendant:
Michael Cappabianca Jr, Diony Nunez, Daniel Lopopolo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. M.J. Mawn, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10798
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
M.J. Mawn, Inc., Historic Boston, Inc. and Santos Nunez-Marte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nunez v. Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting, Co., LLC
as 1:2022cv10272
Plaintiff:
Jose Nunez
Defendant:
Cashman Dredging and Marine Contracting, Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Cano-Ruiz v. Estate of Elpidio Nunez-Marin et al
as 3:2021cv01623
Plaintiff:
Irvine Cano Ruiz and Irvine Cano-Ruiz
Defendant:
Estate of Elpido Nez Marn, Elpido Nez Batista, Ventura Nez Czepiel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vileika Soto-Nunez v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration Forfeiture Counsel
as 1:2021cv91755
In Re:
$75,980 in U.S. Currency
Petitioner:
Vileika Soto-Nunez
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
