Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schofield v. Clarke, et al
as 11-1470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, CAROL MICI, Director of Classification, PAUL F. OXFORD, Acting Chief, Investigative Services and others
Schofield v. US Bank, NA et al
as 1:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Billie R Schofield
Defendant:
US Bank, NA , USAA Federal Savings Bank , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Foley et al v. Auerbach et al
as 1:2010cv11797
Plaintiff:
Joseph Foley , George-Arthur Robinson , Mark Schofield and others
Defendant:
John Auerbach, Abdullah Rehayem and Richard Heidlage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schofield v. Horsman, et al
as 10-1271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUGENE SCHOFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD HORSMAN and STEVEN J. O'BRIEN
Defendant:
RICH MASCIANTONIO, GJON NIVICA, LYNN NIVICA and others
Schofield v. Horsman, et al
as 10-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD HORSMAN and STEVEN J. O'BRIEN
Defendant:
RICH MASCIANTONIO, GJON NIVICA, LYNN NIVICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schofield v. Clarke
as 4:2009cv40204
Plaintiff:
Eugene Schofield
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Hickey
as 09-2247
Petitioner:
In re: MARY ANN HICKEY
:
MARTY KILEY, RUTH E. RICE, MICHELLE SCHOFIELD and others
Respondent:
BRAD LITTLE, KEITH EDISON, WILLIAM GEORGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
