Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 92
Winiarski v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2021cv00246
Defendant: RI Department of Corrections Medical and Mental Health Staff, Dr. Berk, Codac Rehab Services and others
Plaintiff: Paul Winiarski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1332
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Washington-Del Valle, et al v. Rivera-Schatz, et al
as 21-1231
Defendant: JOSE LUIS DALMAU-SANTIAGO, in his official capacity as President of the Senate of Puerto Rico, RAFAEL HERNANDEZ-MONTANEZ, CARLOS JOHNNY MENDEZ, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LUIS A. RIVERA-GONZALEZ, ARIADNA LOPEZ, IVONNE BORRERO-CASADO and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS RIVERA-SCHATZ, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as President of the Senate of Puerto Rico, LISANDRA MALDONADO-ALVARADO, WILFREDO RAMOS-GARCIA and others
Interested Party: PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Latimore v. Poon
as 21-1233
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Correctional Staff, DAVID CLANCY, MCI Norfolk, WILLIAM J. GROSSI, Director of Security, MCI Norfolk and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON K. LATIMORE
Defendant / Appellee: VINCENT POON, MCI Norfolk
Ortiz-Resto, et al v. Rivera-Schatz, et al
as 21-1232
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERTO MALDONADO-VELEZ, Administrative Secretary of the Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, GABRIEL HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Chief of Staff of the President of the Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and THOMAS RIVERA-SCHATZ, President of the Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff / Appellee: JESSICA RIVERA FERRER, CARLOS GUERRA-CRUZ, RAMON RIVERA-LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff: VICTOR RICARDO RODRIGUEZ-FUENTES, MARIA RIOS-MATIENZO, KEISHLA RESTO-SANTIAGO and others
Interested Party: PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Rose v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10306
Plaintiff: Russell Rose
Defendant: Unkown, Named Lieutenants, Unkown BOP Correctional Officer, Unkown Federal Bureau of Prisions Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2020cv00488
Defendant: Staff Parkhurst, Officer Mocey, Particia Coyne-Fague and others
Plaintiff: Samuel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 20-1781
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party: MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients
Plaintiff: SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Byrne v. State of Maryland, et al
as 20-1568
Defendant: JANET WOOD, Harford County Detention Center Staff, DR. ALI, State Managed Mental Health, PAM BAER, Custody Evalator, Mental Health Worker for Harford County and others
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF MARYLAND, ANTHONY MICHAEL DEYESU, HARTFORD, CT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JODIE LOUISE BYRNE
Taylor v. NH State Prison for Men et al
as 1:2020fp00606
Defendant: NH State Prison for Men Medical Staff and NH State Prison for Men
Plaintiff: John Taylor
Not Classified By Court: NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?