Cases 21 - 30 of 3,566
Northup v. Reilly et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Northup
Defendant:
William Reilly and Andrew Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turlish v. Airbnb, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
James Turlish
Defendant:
Airbnb, Inc., Thomas Meyer Childs, Thomas Giles Mayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Hennebury et al v. NewRez c/o PHH Mortgage Services et al
as 1:2024cv10849
Plaintiff:
Joanne M. Hennebury and Thomas E. Hennebury
Defendant:
NewRez c/o PHH Mortgage Services and U.S. Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Brooks v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10804
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brooks
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Productions SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARPER et al v. TAVENNER
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
LINDA HARPER and ANTHONY HARPER
Defendant:
THOMAS TAVENNER, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aero HEC Acquisition I, LLC v. Bransford et al
as 1:2024cv10760
Plaintiff:
Aero HEC Acquisition I, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas L. Bransford and Patricia S. Bransford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Palmer v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10681
Plaintiff:
Thomas Palmer
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duarte v. N.C.S.O et al
as 1:2024cv10643
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
N.C.S.O, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
