Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Cullinan v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv11466
Defendant: Wellpath, Massachusetts Department of Correction, David Duarte and others
Plaintiff: Jonathan P Cullinan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Duart v. Mici, et al
as 20-1558
Interested Party: DAVID BAXTER, SEAN MILLIKEN, JOHN TOBIA and others
Defendant / Appellee: CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction, in Her Official and Individual Capacities, DAVID DUARTE, Superintendent of the Massachusetts Treatment Center, in His Official Capacity Only and LISA A. MITCHELL, Former Superintendent of the Massachusetts Treatment Center, in Her Individual Capacity Only
Plaintiff: JOSEPH C. BOEGGEMAN, MUHAMMAD MAHDI, DEREK GAUGHAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER DUART
Mahdi v. Mici et al
as 1:2020cv10424
Defendant: Carol Mici, Joann Lynds and David Duarte
Plaintiff: Muhammad Mahdi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duarte v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00161
Plaintiff: Susan Duarte
Defendant: Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzaga et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01244
Defendant: Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff: Duarte Gonzaga and Catherine Gonzaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duart v. Mici et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv12489
Plaintiff: Peter Duart, Chrisopher Fladger, Richard Felt and others
Defendant: Carol Mici and Lisa Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duarte v. Barr
as 19-2115
Petitioner: CLAUDIO DUARTE
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?