Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Riches v. Carlton
as 4:2008cv40020
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
Jack Carlton Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches V. Lequire et al
as 4:2008cv40021
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Jerry Allen Lequire and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riches v. Giuliani et al
as 1:2007cv12013
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Rudolph W. Giuliani and Mitt Romney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Libby et al
as 1:2007fp00344
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
I. Lewis Libby, Jr., Valerie Plame Wilson, Joseph C. Wilson, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Affleck et al
as 1:2007cv11972
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riches v. Woodward et al
as 1:2007fp00329
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Bob Woodward and Ann Coulter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Riches v. Belichick et al
as 1:2007cv11817
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Bill Belichick, Tom Brady and Randy Moss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
RICHES v. FANFAN et al
as 2:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
DUNCAN FANFAN, FREDDIE J BOOKER, RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US, et al v. Godin
as 07-2332
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CORI A. GODIN, a/k/a Cori Waterhouse, a/k/a Cori Emmons
Movant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
RICHES v. FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM et al
as 2:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM, UNITED STATES FEDERAL JUDGES, UNITED STATES MARSHALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
