Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. McDermott et al
as 1:2020cv10905
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ann C. McDermott, Alton F. Phillips, IV and Geoffrey B. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Finnie v. McDermotts, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00899
Defendant:
McDermotts, Scott Carpenter and McDermotts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ian Finnie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finnie v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2018cv00897
Defendant:
McDermotts and Scott Carpenter
Plaintiff:
Ian Finnie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finnie v. McDermotts et al
as 1:2018cv00898
Defendant:
McDermotts and Scott Carpenter
Plaintiff:
Ian Finnie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finnie v. McDermotts et al
as 1:2018cv00901
Defendant:
McDermotts and Scott Carpenter
Plaintiff:
Ian Finnie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Costa v. Massachusetts Partnership Correctional Health et al
as 1:2017cv12201
Plaintiff:
Marco Costa
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership Correctional Health, UMass Correctional Health Care, Thomas Groblewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spiegel v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2016cv12654
Defendant:
Angela Ordonez, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Norfolk Probate and Fammily Court and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Spiegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Casa
as 16-1541
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RALPH CASAS, a/k/a Burke
Interested Party:
ISRAEL PEREZ-DELGADO, HECTOR MARTINEZ-MEDINA, SONIA PEREZ-HAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plasencia et al v. Lang et al
as 1:2015cv00249
Defendant:
Robert Giggi, Michael K. Lang and Ryan J. McDermott
Plaintiff:
Indramira Plasencia and Robinson Plasencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
