Cases 31 - 40 of 114
Rise of the Moors v. Medford Massachusetts State Police
as 1:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey, Quinn Khabir El, Tariff Sharif Bey and others
Defendant:
Medford Massachusetts State Police, Matthew McDevitt, Ryan Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Khabir El v. Cumberland Police Department
as 1:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Cumberland Police Department
Plaintiff:
Quinn Khabir El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carresi v. City of Newton
as 1:2020cv11538
Plaintiff:
Brian Malo, James White, Stephen Hodgdon and others
Defendant:
City of Newton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Simone, Jr. v. Monaco et al
as 1:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Monaco, Jonathan Bourget, Clark Gephardt and others
Plaintiff:
Simone, Jr. and Richard Simone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Comcast of New Hampshire, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01270
Plaintiff:
Catherine Quinn and Comcast of New Hampshire, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oppenheimer v. Sterling Equipment, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11659
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Mark David Quinn, Sterling Equipment, Inc., Sterling Equipment, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Simone, Jr.
as 1:2019cv11070
Defendant:
Jonathan Bourget, Clark Gephardt, Robert Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Simone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simone, Jr. v. Monaco et al
as 4:2019cv11070
Defendant:
Jonathan Bourget, Clark Gephardt, Robert Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Simone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. QUINN et al
as 1:2019cv00097
Defendant:
LESLIE QUINN and JAYME QUINN
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Interested Party:
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Lucky Dog LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00668
Defendant:
Destiny Merchandise, LLC, Premier Caging Services, Michael Shine and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
