Cases 41 - 50 of 2,502
Duarte v. N.C.S.O et al
as 1:2024cv10643
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
N.C.S.O, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez et al v. Orange Lantern, Inc.
as 3:2024cv30035
Plaintiff:
Arianny Celeste Lopez, Abigail Ratchford, Andra Cheri Moreland and others
Defendant:
Orange Lantern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
US v. Daniel-Matos
as 24-1222
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALEMAN ANTONIO DANIEL-MATOS
Sarmonpal, et al v. Blanco-Cuadra, et al
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
ARTIT SARMONPAL and WHITNEY ORTIZ
Defendant:
DANIEL BLANCO-CUADRA and RUTH GONZALEZ
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv10592
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
Bridgewater State Hospital, Carol A. Mici, Steven Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tucker, et al v. Werfel
as 24-1147
Petitioner:
CASSANDRA TUCKER and EDWARD F. BRODIE
Respondent:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Edward F. Groden v. Deering Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10393
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Groden, Executive Director of the New England Teamsters Pension Fund and Edward F. Groden
Defendant:
Deering Construction, Inc. and Daniel J. Deering, IV
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hafner v. McKee et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Daniel J. McKee, Peter F. Neronha and Gregg Amore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
