Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Chavez v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv03831
Defendant: C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc
Plaintiff: Maria Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01820
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chavez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv10691
Plaintiff: Juan C. Chavez
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Chavez et al v. Longwood Security Services, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv10251
Plaintiff: Brian Chavez
Defendant: Longwood Security Services, Inc. and Charles Zukowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02068
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11503
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Veleazquez-Chavez v. Holder
as 11-1523
Petitioner: ALEJANDRO VELEAZQUEZ-CHAVEZ
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Norton v. Cross Border Initiative Task F, et al
as 09-1930
Plaintiff - Appellant: WALTER NORTON
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL O'SHAUGHNESSY, BRIAN PROULX, MARK BLANCHARD and others
Defendant: CROSS BORDER INITIATIVE TASK FORCE, MSP ESSEX COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, NASHUA POLICE DEPT and others
Mendez Internet Management Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01667
Plaintiff: Mendez Internet Management Services, Inc., James Mendez, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP MENDEZ-CHAVEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
US v. Deleon
as 09-1857
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: RUTILIO CHAVEZ DELEON, a/k/a Roberto Guerrero Salazar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?