Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Rodriguez-Duarte v. Barr
as 19-1740
Petitioner:
HUMBERTO NOEL RODRIGUEZ-DUARTE
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Romano v. Wall et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
C.O. Tomassi, C.O. Dephillips, Captain Lanoway and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore R Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duarte v. Koki Holdings America LTD.
as 1:2018cv11995
Defendant:
Hitachi Koki U.S.A., LTD. and Koki Holdings America LTD.
Plaintiff:
Jose Duarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williamson v. Brockton et al
as 1:2018cv11273
Defendant:
City of Brockton, Darren Duarte, Jorge Delgado and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12450
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lasanta-Correa et al v. Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo de Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01875
Plaintiff:
Abigail Lasanta-Correa , Javier O Rodriguez , Carmen Elba Lasanta-Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo de Puerto Rico, Inc., EM Physicians of Puerto Rico, PSC, Jose V Rodriguez Escanellas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferreira et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ferreira and Mirandolina Duarte
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duarte et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00606
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Mirandolina Duarte and Carlos Ferreira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
