Cases 51 - 60 of 589
Fresne v. Santos
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
John Fresne
Defendant:
Alexander Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lignos-Lopez et al v. Servicios de Terapia Educativa Girasol, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rafael Lignos-Lopez, Vanessa Padilla-Munoz and D.A.L.P.
Defendant:
Servicios de Terapia Educativa Girasol, Inc., Maribel Lugares-Rossy, David Feliciano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isaac et al v. Blendtec, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11254
Plaintiff:
Shelly Isaac, Alexander Zamudio and Steve Oberly
Defendant:
Blendtec, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Schroeder-Montanez
as 22-1555
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER SCHROEDER-MONTANEZ, a/k/a Blanquito
Wang v. Vounatsos et al
as 1:2022cv11180
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Michel Vounatsos, STELIOS PAPADOPOULOS, Alexander J Denner and others
IN RE: Covidien Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation No. II
as 1:2022md03029
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Easom, Attila Vince Streyar, Kayla M Winters and others
Defendant:
Covidien LP, Covidien Holding Inc., Covidien, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Gormatov
as 22-1401
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER GORMATOV, a/k/a Sasha
Boyd et al v. Lopez Vidal et al
as 3:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boyd, Jonathan Lassers, GFC Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Olmar Lopez Vidal, Cristina Rios Mena, Conjugal partnership Lopez-Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jones v. Hillman, et al
as 22-1256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, SIDNEY HANLON, SIDNEY KEATON-WALKER and others
Santos-Velasquez, et al v. Garland
as 22-1235
Petitioner:
CELINDA DEL MILAGRO SANTOS-VELASQUEZ and RONALD ALEXANDER ORELLANA-SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
