Cases 51 - 60 of 83
Mccants v. Brookline Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv12505
Plaintiff:
Elaine Mccants
Defendant:
Brookline Police Department, John F. Jennings, Daniel Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
US v. Cummings-Avila
as 13-2276
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY JOHN CUMMINGS-AVILA, a/k/a Pitillo, a/k/a Luchador, a/k/a Creepy Thunder, a/k/a Jumping
ACM Penfield CFL, LLC v. Avila-De Jesus et al
as 3:2013cv01751
Plaintiff:
ACM Penfield CFL, LLC
Defendant:
Armando Avila-De Jesus, Luz Nereida Ruiz-Lopez and Conjugal Partnership Avila-Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Avila-Santos v. Executive Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01746
Plaintiff:
Laura I. Avila-Santos
Defendant:
Executive Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Ocasio v. Soto et al
as 3:2013cv01699
Plaintiff:
Leslie Ocasio , Gil Agosto-Santiago , Luis R. Aldiva-Lopez and others
Defendant:
Neftali Soto , Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Soto-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Avila v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Byron Avila
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, One West Bank, FSB, MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
US v. Rijo-Baltazar
as 13-1760
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DIONI RIJO-BALTAZAR, a/k/a Dioni Rijo-Avila
Guerrero Avila v. Clarke, et al
as 13-1704
Petitioner - Appellant:
HECTOR GUERRERO AVILA
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and GARY RODEN, Superintendent
Guerrero Avila v. Clarke, et al
as 13-1447
Petitioner - Appellant:
HECTOR GUERRERO AVILA
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and GARY RODEN, Superintendent
Correia et al v. The Town of Framingham et al
as 1:2012cv10828
Plaintiff:
Jorge Correia and Cathleen Runnals
Defendant:
The Town of Framingham , Scott Brown , Brian Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
