Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company, A/S/O Alan Kemp and Elin Lindsay-Kemp v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2010cv11553
Plaintiff:
Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company, A/S/O Alan Kemp and Elin Lindsay-Kemp
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. CAMDEN et al
as 2:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN, TOWN OF , GEOFF RUSHLAU and LINDSAY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
ROBINSON v. LINDSAY
as 2:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
CAMERON LINDSAY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramos-Rodriguez v. Lindsay
as 08-2096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN C. RAMOS-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMERON LINDSAY, Warden
FRASCA et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
HEIDI FRASCA and JOHN FRASCA
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, JOHN BALDACCI, G STEVEN ROWE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor et al v. Erna et al
as 1:2008cv10534
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Taylor, Elaine Taylor and Jeffrey Taylor
Defendant:
Salvatore Erna and Touring Inc Godsmack
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mogel, et al v. UNUM Life Insurance
as 08-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY MOGEL, TODD D. LINDSAY and JOSEPH R. THORLEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a subsidiary of Unumprovident Corporation
Marino v. Lindsay et al
as 1:2007cv12207
Petitioner:
Vincent Michael Marino
Respondent:
Cameron Lindsay, Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FRASCA et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
HEIDI FRASCA
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, JOHN BALDACCI, G STEVEN ROWE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
