Cases 61 - 70 of 155
Pare v. Harmony House, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv30097
Plaintiff:
Warren L. Pare
Defendant:
Harmony House, Inc., Cindy L. Pare, Maria Desmarais and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Pare v. Pare et al
as 3:2018cv30055
Plaintiff:
Warren L. Pare
Defendant:
Cindy L. Pare, Maria Desmarais, Ernest Laflamme, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernando et al v. Federal Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2018cv10504
Plaintiff:
Ashan Fernando and Megan Fernando
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Co. and Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
WYMAN et al v. UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
KENNETH F WYMAN, JR and MEGAN K II LLC F/V
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION and MALLINCKRODT US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Skehel v. Dowley et al
as 1:2018cv10083
Plaintiff:
Christopher Skehel
Defendant:
Mark M Dowley , Megan Wiesen Dowley and Megan Wiesen Dowley Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Integra LifeSciences Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv40002
Plaintiff:
Megan McCarthy Clark
Defendant:
Integra LifeSciences Corporation and Paul N. Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Costa v. Massachusetts Partnership Correctional Health et al
as 1:2017cv12201
Plaintiff:
Marco Costa
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership Correctional Health, UMass Correctional Health Care, Thomas Groblewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
