Cases 61 - 70 of 434
Thrash v. Smyth et al
as 1:2020cv00319
Plaintiff:
Cedric D Thrash
Defendant:
Brenda Smyth and William Smyth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Common Cause Rhode Island et al v. Gorbea et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Plaintiff:
Barbara Monahan, League of Women Voters of Rhode Island, Miranda Oakley and others
Defendant:
Rhode Island Republican Party, Nellie M. Gorbea, Diane C. Mederos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Goldin et al v. Restrepo et al
as 1:2020cv00262
Defendant:
Janice Pucci, Diane C. Mederos, Edward Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Acosta, Jeanine Calkin, Gayle Goldin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Simmons-Telep v. Roger Williams University
as 1:2020cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Simmons-Telep
Defendant:
Roger Williams University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arevalo Carrillo v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Respondent:
MATTHEW T ALBENCE, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S Attorney General William Barr and others
Petitioner:
Elmer Alfredo Arevalo Carrillo
Defendant:
Acting Director Todd Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00167
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Efreom et al v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island, Gina Raimondo and Seth Magaziner
Plaintiff:
Brian Kennedy, Mary O'Connell McKenna, Sandra L. McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
