Cases 71 - 80 of 95
CHAPMAN v. STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2011cv00459
Plaintiff:
HEATH M CHAPMAN
Defendant:
STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENN v. KNOX COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
CATHY PENN
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY, KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KNOX COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. Town of Huntington et al
as 3:2011cv30125
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
Town of Huntington, Planning Board of Town of Huntington, Michael Brisebois and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
IN RE: DIVERSE ABILITIES DAYCARE INC, ET AL
as 2:2011mc00007
Movant:
DIVERSE ABILITIES DAYCARE INC and LAUREN HEATH
Respondent:
US DEPT OF STATE, INSPECTOR GENERAL
Global Naps, Inc. v. Gangi
as 10-1962
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Movant - Appellant:
JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
:
, , and others
Kessel et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03002
Plaintiff:
Jess Kessel and Kimberly Heath-Kessel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Wrenn, et al
as 09-2054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM WRENN, BRUCE W. CATTELL, GREGORY CROMPTON and others
Interested Party:
NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NH ATTORNEY GENERAL
Campbell v. Hooksett School District, et al
as 09-1959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZABETH JUANITA CAMPBELL, by mother and friend of other J.P.E.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
HOOKSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT, CAROL SOUCY, JOANNE ESAU and others
Interested Party:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gary Todd Heath v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2009cv10442
Petitioner:
Gary Todd Heath
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
