Cases 71 - 80 of 118
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows, et al
as 15-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Movant - Appellant:
SARAH COLE, FADHAL MOORE, ARJINI KUMARI NAWAL and others
US v. Vazquez-Santana
as 15-1787
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
NELSON OMAR VAZQUEZ-SANTANA, a/k/a Nelson Omar Vasquez-Santana
Vasquez-Collado v. Lynch
as 15-1600
Petitioner:
RUDY ANTONIO VASQUEZ-COLLADO
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, Attorney General
C.S.N. et al v. Jetblue Airways Corporation
as 1:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
S. C. N. and Edward Cabrera Vasquez
Defendant:
Jetblue Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Varner v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2014cv12360
Plaintiff:
Della A. Varner , Malinda A. Osborn , Beverly J. Yocum and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. , Covidien, Inc., Covidien, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez Vasquez v. Holder, Jr.
as 14-1054
Petitioner:
CARLOS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ VASQUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Gonzalez-Madera et al v. Soto et al
as 3:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
Ludfrey Gonzalez-Madera
Defendant:
Walter Soto, Garcia, De Jesus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv13099
Plaintiff:
Rosa Vasquez
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holding Inc, Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vasquez v. Desmarai
as 13-2400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAFAEL VASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL DESMARAIS
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Tommy Doyles Hyannis, LLC, et al
as 1:2013cv12258
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Paul Simon Music , Pentagon Music Co. and others
Defendant:
Tommy Doyles Hyannis, LLC, Alan O'Sullivan and Matthew Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
