Cases 81 - 90 of 850
Faville v. Munro
as 1:2022cv11911
Plaintiff:
Kelly Faville
Defendant:
Mark Munro and Whacky Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv30143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Spears, et al
as 22-1855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, Father and Next Friend of Minors A,B, and C
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDA S. SPEARS, Commissioner of Massachusetts Department of Children, Individually, PATRICIA KELLY, as a State Employee and Individually, JUDITH EDWARDS, as a State Employee and Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lessieur v. Kelly
as 22-1789
Petitioner:
SHAWN LESSIEUR
Respondent:
SHEILA KELLY, Superintendent, MCI Concord
Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv00372
Defendant:
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc, United States Of America, George W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Zarlenga and Victoria A. Zarlenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. The Geo Group
as 22-1736
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY M. KELLY
Defendant / Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP and GEO GROUP
Strahan v. McNamara et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Richard Maximus Strahan
Defendant:
William McNamara, Tracy Birmingham, Steven Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Louis et al
as 1:2022cv11648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Louis and Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gumkowski v. Kelly
as 1:2022cv11650
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gumkowski
Defendant:
Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
