Cases 1 - 10 of 287
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv12210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
FLOYD v. WALDO COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00242
Defendant:
DARRIN MOODY, WALDO COUNTY, NICK OETTINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN J FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Molina-Torres v. Quetglas-Jordan
as 3:2024cv01292
Defendant:
Jose F. Quetglas-Jordan
Plaintiff:
Yadira Molina-Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Naicom Corporation, et al v. Dish Network Corporation, et al
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
NAICOM CORPORATION, D&V IP HOLDINGS, LLC, PAYLINK, LLC and others
Defendant:
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK L.L.C., NAGRASTAR L.L.C. and others
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
SABRINA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, JUDGE THERESA A. BISENIUS, JUDGE JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK and others
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv10080
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Judge Theresa Bisenius, Judge Jennifer Ulwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Appel v. Westport Police Officer et al
as 1:2023cv12877
Plaintiff:
Ari Appel
Defendant:
Westport Police Officer, Fernando A. Goncalves, Judge Howard Speicher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Greco v. Quetglas-Jordan et al
as 3:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
W. Scott Greco
Defendant:
Eric Quetglas-Jordan and Quetglas Law Offices
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
