Cases 1 - 10 of 434
Velez-Acevedo v. Santos
as 3:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Alfredo Velez-Acevedo
Defendant:
Domingo Emanuelli-Hernandez and Pedro Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acevedo Candelario v. Roldan-Concepcion et al
as 3:2024cv01268
Defendant:
Julio Roldan-Concepcion, Grisell Lausell and The Municipal Goverment of Aguadilla
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Acevedo Candelario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Acevedo v. Mici
as 1:2024cv11486
Respondent:
Carol Mici
Petitioner:
Angel Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Acevedo-Rodriguez
as 24-1455
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
BRIAN JERIEL ACEVEDO-RODRIGUEZ
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Cuevas-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Javier J. Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Cuevas-Ramos, Carmen Ramona Natal-Perez, Edgardo Luis Cuevas-Natal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acevedo Vives v. US
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
MAYDA I. ACEVEDO and MAYDA I. ACEVEDO VIVES
Defendant:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES and US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, for the District of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Acevedo Jr. v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY et al
as 1:2023cv12409
Plaintiff:
Jose Acevedo Jr.
Defendant:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY and PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION A/K/A PROGRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
IN RE: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 1:2023md03083
Plaintiff:
Shavonne Diggs, Brady Bradberry, Christina Bradberry and others
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Maximus Federal Services, Inc., The Berwyn Group, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
