Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Atwood et al v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv13253
Plaintiff: Chelsea N. Atwood and General Dynamics Corporation
Defendant: Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company and GROUP INSURANCE & HEALTH BENEFITS FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Atwood v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv13202
Plaintiff: Rowland Andrew Atwood
Defendant: Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medina v. Atwood et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff: Edgar Medina
Defendant: Richard Atwood, Kelley McKiernan, Zachary Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
BEAN MAINE LOBSTER INC et al v. MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff: BEAN MAINE LOBSTER INC, MAINE LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, MAINE COAST FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC and others
Defendant: MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Wright et al v. Cummins Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10496
Plaintiff: Bruce S Wright and Louise K Wright
Cross Claimant: Cummins Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., IMO Industries Inc. and others
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to The Cooper-Bessemer Corporation, Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: General Electric Company, ITT LLC, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATWOOD v. EXACTECH INC et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff: JOSEPH ATWOOD
Defendant: EXACTECH INC, EXACTECH US INC, TPG INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Atwood v. FCI Berlin, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00526
Petitioner: Rodger Atwood, II
Respondent: FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff: Robert J Gillis
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant: Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party: Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court: Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff: Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company
Interested Party: Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cook et al v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv11362
Plaintiff: Roland Cook and Linda Cook
Defendant: Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?