Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1515
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant: BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Howell v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, et al
as 24-1368
Plaintiff: CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant: MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
IbnRaymone v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv11444
Plaintiff: AbdulQayyum Muhammed IbnRaymone
Defendant: Ceaser Abreu, Boston Police Department, City of Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. Boston Police Department A-7
as 1:2024cv11031
Plaintiff: Gregory M Strong
Defendant: Boston Police Department A-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howell v. Pine Street Inn, et al
as 24-1369
Plaintiff: CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant: PINE STREET INN, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Gamble Williams v. Boston Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv10701
Plaintiff: Theodore Gamble Williams
Defendant: Boston Police Department, Boston Police Officer John Doe and Boston Police Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Boston Medical Center Hospital, et al
as 24-1142
Plaintiff: CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant: BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mazza v. City Of Boston et al
as 1:2024cv10333
Plaintiff: Anthony Mazza
Defendant: City Of Boston, Frank J. Olbrys, Edward Kennealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell v. Boston Police Department, et al
as 24-1129
Plaintiff: CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant: BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY and PLANET FITNESS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?