Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Hecking v. NH Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 14-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIRCK HECKING
Defendant - Appellee:
NH CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES, KELLY AYOTTE, KATHERINE J. BARGER and others
Barger et al v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv12619
Plaintiff:
Vickie Barger , Peggy Sumner , Lisa Maddox and others
Defendant:
Ameridose LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hecking v. New Hampshire Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 1:2013cv00338
Defendant:
Kelly Ayotte, Katherine Barger, Tim Beaupre and others
Plaintiff:
Dirck Hecking
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hecking v. Barger, et al
as 10-1299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIRCK HECKING
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE J. BARGER, JAMES D. CASEY and GEORGE N. COPADIS
Hecking v. Barger et al
as 1:2008cv00490
Plaintiff:
Dirck Hecking
Defendant:
Katherine J. Barger, James D. Casey and George N. Copadis
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
