Cases 1 - 10 of 25
PLOURDE v. HIGGINS et al
as 1:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
GLEN PLOURDE
Defendant:
BRIAN HIGGINS, EDWIN LEWIS, SHANNON DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHASE v. COSTLOW et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L CHASE
Defendant:
FREDERICK F COSTLOW, CITY OF BANGOR, JOHN C NIVISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHASE v. CITY OF BANGOR et al
as 1:2020cv00287
Defendant:
MICHAEL PINA, UNKNOWN OFFICERS, STEVEN BUZZELL and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L CHASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERRILL et al v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2020cv00248
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, KATHERINE JONES, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL PEABODY, PAULINE LAMONTAGNE, LYNN MERRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00158
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
WHITTINGTON v. CITY OF BANGOR HALL
as 1:2019cv00553
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WHITTINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON v. C&L AEROSPACE HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00094
Defendant:
C&L AEROSPACE HOLDINGS LLC, CITY OF BANGOR, MAINE and PD INDUSTRIES INC
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANUEL v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2018cv00300
Plaintiff:
GARY E MANUEL
Defendant:
BANGOR FIRE DEPARTMENT, S MCCARTY, JASON MCAMBLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
CITY OF BANGOR v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 1:2018cv00298
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF BANGOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITTINGTON v. CITY OF BANGOR et al
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WHITTINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR and COMMUNITY CONNECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
