Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Wright v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
David Daoud Wright
Defendant:
Daniel Martin and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Valerio v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
William Valerio
Defendant:
Daniel Martin, Ron Lebonte, Jessica Dupont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv11217
Petitioner:
Ariel Omar Velasquez
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv10538
Petitioner:
Faith Newton
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Marshalls and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Velasquez v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Ariel O. Velasquez
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Warden Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Onyobeno v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00148
Petitioner:
Wisdom Oghenekaro Onyobeno
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Villafuerte Guerra v. Martin
as 1:2021cv00468
Plaintiff:
Tomas Villafuerte Guerra
Defendant:
Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velasquez v. Martin, et al.
as 1:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ariel O. Velasquez
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Martin, Major/Chief Michael Nessinger, Sergeant A Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
