Cases 1 - 10 of 35
USA v. a. one (1) Genuine Gucci Mens Chronoscope 101M G Design with Stainless Steel Bracelet, Black Dial with bezel set, Serial No. 11885892 et al
as 3:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
a. one (1) Genuine Gucci Mens Chronoscope 101M G Design with Stainless Steel Bracelet, Black Dial with bezel set, Serial No. 11885892, b. one (1) 10K Yellow Gold Square Foxtail Chain Long Necklace 25.0 inches Length with Lobster Closing Clasp, c. one (1) Mens Fake Rolex Watch, Submariner Style 18K All Stainless Steel Case and Bracelet Black, Inside Bezel or Lugs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. 1.One Genuine Mens Rolex Watch, Submariner Style, 41MM, Sapphire Crystal, Blue Ceramic Bezel Blue Dial, Serial No. 386U64F7 et al
as 3:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
1). ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLUE CERAMIC BEZEL BLUE DIAL, SERIAL NO. 386U64F7;, [2] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, STAINLESS STEEL & 18K YELLOW GOLD, SERIAL NO. 42DM7808;, [3] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLACK DIAL W/CERAMIC BLACK BEZEL, SERIAL NO. 554825R6; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. Genuine Rolex 18k Solid Rose Gold Watch, GMT Master II Design et al
as 3:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD WATCH, GMT MASTER II DESIGN WITH SOLID ROSE GOLD OYSTER BRACELET REF. 126715. GOLD CONDITION., GENUINE ROLEX MEN'S18K YACHTMASTER II ALL YELLOW GOLD WATCH, WHITE DIAL, CERAMIC BLUE BEZEL OYSTER BRACELET, WITH DOUBLE CLASP. MODEL NUMBER# 116688, SERIAL NUMBER H44V7303 INCLUDES ORIGINAL, GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD AND STAINLESSSTEEL WATCH, YACHTMASTER II DESIGN REF. 116681, SERIAL NUMBER# 5538L503, WHITE DIAL WITH BLUE COLORED CERAMIC BEZEL, INCLUDING WARRANTY CARD, ORIGIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Cook et al v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv11362
Plaintiff:
Roland Cook and Linda Cook
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group v. A and J Tool & Findings Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00497
Defendant:
EEM, Inc., McDonald's Corporation, American Textile and others
Plaintiff:
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group and Peterson - Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
The Dial Corporation v. Carter, et al
as 17-8009
Respondent:
MICHELLE CARTER, JONATHAN CESSNA, ALICIA GENTILE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FEUER, MARTIN HOMMEL, KAMI RALEIGH and others
Petitioner:
DIAL CORP.
Defendant:
HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.
Interested Party:
RHONDA D. JONES
The Dial Corporation v. Carter, et al
as 17-8009
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHELLE CARTER, JONATHAN CESSNA, ALICIA GENTILE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FEUER, MARTIN HOMMEL, KAMI RALEIGH and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
DIAL CORP.
Defendant:
HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.
Interested Party:
RHONDA D. JONES
Dial v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, et al
as 17-1259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLORELLA DIAL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Servi Sales, Inc. v. Henkel Corporation
as 3:2015cv02550
Plaintiff:
Servi Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Henkel Corporation , Henkel Colombiana, SAS, Henkel Consumer Goods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerry Worlds & American Fair Gift Association, Inc. v. Cahalen et al
as 4:2014cv40158
Defendant:
Gannett Publications, Creditscore.com, Switchboard LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Worlds & American Fair Gift Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
