Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Garcia v. Terrico et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dari Garcia
Defendant:
Dr. Christine Terrico, Dr. Christopher Salas, NP Taborelli Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mirror Lawn Turf Doctor, Inc. v. Northeast Landscaping & Tree Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Mirror Lawn Turf Doctor, Inc.
Defendant:
Northeast Landscaping & Tree Services, Inc., Valerie Joyner, Denise Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Paiva v. Salas et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Richard Paiva
Defendant:
Dr. Christopher Salas, Doctor Justin Berk and Pauline Marcussen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DaPonte v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2021cv00222
Defendant:
Kodac Substance Abuse Services, Doctor Burke, Lynn Corry and others
Plaintiff:
John T DaPonte, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. International Doctors Association et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
International Doctors Association, Texas Government Doctors and U.S. Government Doctors
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romano v. Wall et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
C.O. Tomassi, C.O. Dephillips, Captain Lanoway and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore R Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coyle et al v. Family Doctor Plus-RI, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Shawn E. Coyle and Barbara J. Watson
Defendant:
Family Doctor Plus-RI, LLC, FDP Equities, LLC and William L. Welter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tipple v. Deputy Warden Lefebvre et al
as 1:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Tipple
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Lefebvre, Nurse McCloskey, Doctor Fine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
