Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Soule v. Clinton et al
as 1:2015cv13766
Plaintiff:
Regina H. Soule
Defendant:
Hilary Clinton, Nancy Pilosi and Whitey Bulger
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Bouvier v. Bush et al
as 1:2014cv14331
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Hilary Clinton and John Kerry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv12084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hara v. Office of Personal Management, et al
as 10-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN HARA
Plaintiff:
NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Defendant:
HILARY CLINTON
Intervenor:
LAMAR S. SMITH
Gill, et al v. Office of Personnel Management, et al
as 52-2207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH TONEY and ALBERT TONEY, III
Defendant - Appellant:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Intervenor:
LAMAR S. SMITH
Defendant:
HILARY CLINTON
Gill, et al v. Office of Personal Management, et al
as 10-2207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NANCY GILL, MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, MARTIN KOSKI and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH TONEY and ALBERT TONEY, III
Defendant - Appellant:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and others
Intervenor:
LAMAR S. SMITH
Defendant:
HILARY CLINTON
Anees v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2010cv11417
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Anees
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder, Jr., Hilary Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Becker v. Beightler, et al
as 08-1873
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAN BECKER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BEIGHTLER, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, DAVID H. SOUTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
