Cases 1 - 10 of 35
imageSurge, Inc. v. Alshine et al
as 1:2023cv12844
Plaintiff:
imageSurge, Inc.
Defendant:
Ilya Alshine, Interscope LLC and Interscope LLC doing business as Interscope Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
IN RE: Petition for Leave to File by Enjoined
as 1:2022mc91114
Plaintiff:
Ilya Liviz
Defendant:
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Liviz v. Robert L. Ryan
as 1:2021cv11294
Plaintiff:
Ilya Liviz, Sr.
Defendant:
Dedham District Court- Clerk Magistrate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz v. Dedham District Court- Clerk Magistrate
as 1:2021cv00651
Plaintiff:
Ilya Liviz, Sr.
Defendant:
Dedham District Court- Clerk Magistrate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11993
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020mc91220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
I.L. v. SJC of Massachusetts
as 19-1604
Respondent / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Petitioner / Appellant:
I.L., JR., son, by his biological parent Ilya Liviz, Sr., (Dad), the Chief Jurist for Justice of National Academy for Jurist of USA and I.L., JR., son, by his biological parent Ilya Liviz, Sr., Dad, the Chief Jurist for Justice of National Academy for Jurist of USA
Liviz v. Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2019cv11289
Respondent:
Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Petitioner:
Ilya Liviz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In Re: Liviz, Sr.
as 19-8009
Respondent:
ILYA LIVIZ, SR.
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
