Cases 1 - 10 of 200
Dahua Technology USA, Inc. v. Zhang
as 24-1350
Plaintiff:
DAHUA TECHNOLOGY USA, INC.
Defendant:
FENG ZHANG
Petitioner:
DANIEL BARNHIZER, CARTER G. BISHOP, BRIAN H. BIX and others
Morin et al v. Gray et al
as 1:2024cv10648
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Morin, Raymond Boissonault and Shawn Inglis
Defendant:
Dean Gray and Joe Ayala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fantel, Jr. v. Town of South Kingstown et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of South Kingstown, South Kingstown Police Department, Washington County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morin v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10634
Petitioner:
Jeremy Morin
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusettes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Markley v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv13079
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Markley
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Nuance Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Watson v. Hodge et al
as 1:2023cv12909
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Donald Watson
Defendant:
Jascha Franklin Hodge, Boston Transportation Dept. and City Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fiorillo v. NE Edge, LLC, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Plaintiff:
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC, GOTSPACE DATA PARTNERS LLC, GOT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES SARL, APPLE INC. and others
Corbett v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10104
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Corbett
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. HILL
as 1:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
JEREMY J HILL
Interested Party:
GEORGE E ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
