Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Arcell, et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 23-1897
Plaintiff / Appellant: KATHERINE R. ARCELL, JOSE M. BRITO, JAN-MARIE BROWN and others
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY NIEBOR, GABRIEL GARAVANIAN and JUNE STANSBURY
Defendant / Appellee: JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Interested Party: UNITED STATES, UNITED AIRLINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
Garavanian et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10678
Plaintiff: Gabriel Garavanian, Katherine R. Arcell, Jose M. Brito and others
Defendant: Jet Blue Airways Corporation and Spirit Airlines Inc
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Bell v. Trentzch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv30102
Plaintiff: Sharon-Shawn A. Bell
Defendant: Johnathan Trentzch, Jeffrey Hartman, Lt. Rosay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jolly v. US Equal Employment Opportunities Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff: Maketa A. Jolly
Defendant: US Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, James Condos and Larry Novins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Luk, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv12191
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant: Luk, Inc., Guardian Ad Litem Matthew P. Moran, Jack Loiselle, Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Ornelas v. City of Manchester, NH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00394
Defendant: George Antillus, Zina Barnes, Lawrence Bolduc and others
Plaintiff: Fernando Ornelas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jolly v. Randolph Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv11588
Plaintiff: William James Jolly
Defendant: Randolph Police Department and Norfolk County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jolly v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03535
Plaintiff: Randy L. Jolly
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Mlodzinski, et al v. Lewis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1966
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS MLODZINSKI and TINA MLODZINSKI, Individually and as mother and next friend of J.M. other J. M.
Plaintiff: AMY FURMANICK
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL LEWIS, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Sergeant, TIMOTHY J. WOODWARD, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Officer, GORDON C. RAMSAY, in his individual and official capacity as Bristol Police Department Officer and others
Defendant: CENTRAL NEW HAMPSHIRE SPECIAL OPERATIONS UNIT, a/k/a CNHSOU, JOHN DOES, 1-20 , Members of Central New Hampshire Special Operations Unit, in their individual and official capacities, ROBERT CORMIER, Officer, Plymouth Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others
Mlodzinski, et al v. Cormier, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1967
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS MLODZINSKI and TINA MLODZINSKI, Individually and as mother and next friend of J.M. other J. M.
Plaintiff: AMY FURMANICK
Defendant - Appellant: RICHARD ARELL, Officer, Northfield Police Department, in his individual and official capacities, CENTRAL NEW HAMPSHIRE SPECIAL OPERATIONS UNIT, a/k/a CNHSOU, ROBERT CORMIER, Officer, Plymouth Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant: JOHN DOES, 1-20 , Members of Central New Hampshire Special Operations Unit, in their individual and official capacities, STEVE HENRY, Officer, Tilton Police Department, in his individual and official capacities, BILL JOLLY, Officer, Groton Police Department, in his individual and official capacities and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?