Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Cruz v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv11425
Defendant:
Raytheon Company, John/Jane Does 1-10 and Kelly B. Lappin
Plaintiff:
Johnny Cruz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ferguson v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv10222
Plaintiff:
James Michael Ferguson
Defendant:
Loretta E. Lynch, Harley G. Lappin, John Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Lappin, et al
as 1:2013cv12023
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Coleman
Defendant:
Harlay G. Lappin and David D. Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
In re: Wattleton, et al
as 13-1297
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and T. MARSHAL, Director US Marshal Service
Judd v. Holder, et al
as 12-1784
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Graham, Jr. v. Grondolsky, et al
as 12-1361
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, Warden, Fort Devens, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
HAMLIN v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R HAMLIN
Defendant:
USA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, NOEL C MARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Judd v. Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-1783
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Parisi v. Lappin, et al
as 11-1648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN A. PARISI
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CAROLYN A. SABOL, JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY and others
Judd v. Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-1512
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
