Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ligeri v. Optimistic Investments, LLC, et al
as 22-1331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN JOSEPH LIGERI
3Rd Party Defendant:
WHOLLY WHOLESALE, LLC and CENTRAL CONCEPTS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
OPTIMISTIC INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
KANGAROO MANUFACTURING INC. and JOSHUA TISCHER
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MURPHY
Interested Party:
JASON KHOURY and VERIFIED FINANCIALS, LLC
Ligeri v. Optimistic Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv11654
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Joseph Ligeri
Defendant:
Optimistic Investments, LLC, Joshua Tischer and Kangaroo Manufacturing Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Counter Defendant:
Central Concepts, Inc. and Wholly Wholesale, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE . ALL PLEADINGS SHOULD BE FILED DOCKET No: 1:91-cr-10039-DPW-5
as 1:2019cv12126
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Michael Murphy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murphy v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy v. MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
as 1:2016cv11684
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. USA
as 1:2016cv11306
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Michael Murphy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murphy v. Kahn
as 1:2015cv12964
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Donnalynn Kahn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pisano v. Ambrosino et al
as 1:2013cv11409
Plaintiff:
Clifford Pisano
Defendant:
Tom Ambrosino, Michael Murphy, Paul Cappizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Murphy v. Law Offices of Howard Lee Schiff, P.C.
as 1:2013cv10724
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy, II
Defendant:
Law Offices of Howard Lee Schiff, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
