Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Nixon et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Joshua Nixon and Celena Nixon
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jamimani v. Every US President after President Richard M. Nixon et al
as 1:2024cv11672
Defendant:
The Nation of Islam and All Nazi, Robert Crane and Every US President after President Richard M. Nixon
Plaintiff:
Chosen One Jamimani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bader v. Watson et al
as 1:2023cv11354
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bader
Defendant:
James Watson and Phylis Nixon Bosomworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bader v. Watson et al
as 4:2023cv11354
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bader
Defendant:
James Watson and Phylis Nixon Bosomworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ortiz v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Bautista Ortiz Nixon Javier and Nixon Javier Bautista Ortiz
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gilman v. USA
as 1:2020cv01112
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Gilman and Esquire Leslie C Nixon
Defendant:
Attorney General WILLIAM BARRE, Scott W. Murray and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
LOUIS v. WALTZ et al
as 1:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
NIXON LOUIS
Defendant:
GARY WALTZ, DAVID ALLEN and JOHN DILLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orekoya v. Rainer, et al
as 16-8050
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SUNDAY D. OREKOYA
Defendant - Respondent:
ANDREW A. RAINER, SHAPIRO, HABER AND URMY, LLP, JOHN REINSTEIN and others
Orekoya v. Rainer, et al
as 16-8035
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SUNDAY D. OREKOYA
Defendant - Respondent:
ANDREW A. RAINER, SHAPIRO, HABER AND URMY, LLP, JOHN REINSTEIN and others
Orekoya v. Rainer, et al
as 15-2473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDAY D. OREKOYA
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW A. RAINER, SHAPIRO, HABER AND URMY, LLP, JOHN REINSTEIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
