Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bourgeois v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 24-1150
Plaintiff:
JODI BOURGEOIS
Defendant:
GAP, INC., OLD NAVY INC., BANANA REPUBLIC and others
Poshpeck v. Old Navy, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Richard Poshpeck
Defendant:
Old Navy, LLC and Waterstone Properties Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Navy Federal Credit Union v. Estate of Walter E. Thomas III et al
as 1:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Estate of Walter E. Thomas III, Tiffany L. Skinner-DeSouza, Walter E. Thomas, VI and others
Interpleader:
State of Rhode Island Division of Taxation and Internal Revenue Service
Cintron v. Balzano et al
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jose Cintron
Defendant:
John Balzano, II and United States of America Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Bourgeois v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jodi Bourgeois
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Old Navy, LLC, Banana Republic, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mahoney v. Del Toro
as 23-1615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL RICHARD MAHONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Navy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lemieux v. Charlestown Marina et al
as 1:2023cv11059
Plaintiff:
Robert M Lemieux
Defendant:
Charlestown Marina, Charlestown Navy Yard and Kiely and Ferrante LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weiler v. The British Royal Navy
as 1:2023cv10154
Plaintiff:
Gregory Arthur Weiler, II
Defendant:
The British Royal Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
