Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Olivier v. Dept of Corrections
as 1:2023cv12582
Petitioner:
Herve Olivier, Jr
Respondent:
Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petion v. Rodriguez
as 1:2020cv11936
Petitioner:
Olivier Petion
Respondent:
Maria Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gillier v. Inversiones 20 20 PR, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01163
Plaintiff:
Olivier Robert Gillier
Defendant:
Inversiones 20 20 PR, LLC , Servicios Agecom, LLC , George Burguillos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEICO Marine Insurance Company v. Servicios Agecom, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02746
Plaintiff:
GEICO Marine Insurance Company
Defendant:
Servicios Agecom, LLC and Olivier Gillier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Olivier v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
Brian Olivier
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cornavaca et al v. Rios-Mena et al
as 3:2013cv01767
Plaintiff:
Eric Cornavaca , Manuel Laboy and Olivier G. Perrinjaquet
Defendant:
Ivan Rios-Mena, Elizabeth Sola-Oliver, Alberto Baco-Bague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivier v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Brian Olivier
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nasuti v. Kimball, et al
as 10-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES NASUTI
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE D. KIMBALL, JOHN TARLTON OLIVIER and VALERIE S. WILLARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nasuti v. Kimball et al
as 3:2009cv30183
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Nasuti
Defendant:
Catherine D Kimball, John Tarlton Olivier and Valerie S. Willard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
