Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Robbins v. POSC PAC
as 1:2024cv11188
Plaintiff:
Zachary Robbins
Defendant:
POSC PAC doing business as National Police Officers Alliance PAC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Zeigler v. Arietis Health LLC
as 1:2023cv13018
Plaintiff:
Robbin Zeigler
Defendant:
Arietis Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Robbins v. NH Dept of HHS
as 1:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ruth A. Robbins
Defendant:
NH Dept of HHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ly v. Luxury Logistics, LLC. et al
as 3:2023cv30043
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Ly
Defendant:
Luxury Logistics, LLC., David Rodriguez, Eddie Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Clervrain v. Healey et al
as 1:2022cv10545
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey, Bill Galvin, Ed Markey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robbins v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10257
Defendant:
Covidien LLC doing business as Covidien LP formerly known as Tyco Healthcare Group LP, Covidien, Inc., Covidien Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
James Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROCKETT v. WESTERN SEA INC et al
as 1:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
SHAUN ROCKETT
Defendant:
WESTERN SEA INC and GLENN ROBBINS
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Larsen v. State of Maine, et al
as 21-1422
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MAINE, JARED CARNEY, KIMBERLY ROBBINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ALLEN LARSEN, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
