Cases 1 - 10 of 369
US v. Enamorado
as 23-1556
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR ENAMORADO, a/k/a Vida Loca
Interested Party:
SAUL RIVERA
Mendez-Cardona et al v. Guzman-Lopez et al
as 3:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
Edwin Mendez Cardona, Ramon Garcia Carrero, Vilma Hernandez Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Gerson Guzman Lopez, Myrnalee Lamboy Rivera, Mayra Rivera Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Vaquerano Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-1275
Petitioner:
SAUL ALFREDO VAQUERANO HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Kaczor v. Saul et al
as 3:2023cv30027
Plaintiff:
William R. Kaczor
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Rivera-Fuentes, et al v. Kijakazi, et al
as 23-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMANUEL RIVERA-FUENTES, GLADYS FUENTES LOZADA, ROSE KATHERINE RUIZ MINGUELA, represented by her mother, Maria Minguela Arroyo and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, NANCY A. BERRYHILL, in her personal capacity and others
Interested Party:
ALEXANDER JODINSKAS MINGUELA, represented by his mother, Maria Minguela Arroyo, IRMARY DOMENECN PIEIRO, represented by her father, Jose Domenech Rodriguez and MARITZA FRASQUERI BERROS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Costa v. Kijakazi
as 22-1890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA COSTA
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of Social Security Administration and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Laccinole v. MRS BPO, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC, Saul Freedman and Jeffrey Freedman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Laccinole v. MRS BPO, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC, Saul Freedman and Jeffrey Freedman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
