Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Triumph Foods, LLC, et al v. Campbell, et al
as 24-1759
Interested Party:
ANIMAL EQUALITY, ANIMAL OUTLOOK, COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTENSEN FARMS MIDWEST, LLC, individually and on behalf of its members, HANOR COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, LLC, individually and on behalf of its members, EICHELBERGER FARMS, INC., individually and on behalf of its members and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant:
ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General of Massachusetts and ASHLEY RANDLE, Massachusetts Commissioner of Agriculture
L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L. M., a minor by and through his father and stepmother and natural guardians, Christopher and Susan Morrison
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDDLEBOROUGH, MA, MIDDLEBOROUGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, CAROLYN J. LYONS, Superintendent, Middleborough Public Schools, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
INSTITUTE FOR FAITH AND FAMILY, PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 20-1781
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party:
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients
Plaintiff:
SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 19-1836
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party:
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING
Plaintiff:
SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant:
DIANE FOLEY, MD, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
J DOE, DO, MPH, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE and SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
US, et al v. Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 11-1336
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. David M. Kammerer and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KAMMERER
Defendant - Appellee:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ALZA CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Interested Party:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA, BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Rohn, et al v. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Cen, et al
as 11-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Plaintiff:
MILTON GREENE, CROSSROADS ACQUISITION CORP, WILLIAM M. PORTER and others
Defendant:
TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party - Appellee:
DANA FARBER/HARVARD CANCER CENTER, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Interested Party:
SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al
as 10-2494
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party:
SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al
as 09-1887
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROHN, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party:
SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
United States ex rel et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10288
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Bernard Lisitza , State of Illinois and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., , Johnson & Johnson , Janssen, LP and others
Intervenor:
Attorney General and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Amicu:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and Biotechnology Industry Organization
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
