Cases 1 - 10 of 17,852
Rijo-Brito v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01263
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rijo-Brito
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
US v. Griffin
as 24-1541
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DANIEL J. GRIFFIN
Interested Party:
US DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
US v. Lasanta-Sanchez
as 24-1537
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSE MANUEL LASANTA-SANCHEZ
US v. Griffin
as 24-1540
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DANIEL J. GRIFFIN
Interested Party:
US DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
US v. Rodriguez-Velez
as 24-1542
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
EDUARDO RODRIGUEZ-VELEZ, a/k/a Eduardito
Block v. Boncher, et al
as 24-1530
Plaintiff:
WAYLEN BLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN AMY BONCHER, in her official and individual capacity as Warden for FMC Devens, SINCADA, in his official capacity as acting Case Manager for petitioner at FMC Devens, HANSEN, as acting Councilor for petitioner at FMC evens in official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Approximately $143,586.44 Seized from JPMorgan Chase Account Number XXXXX8228, et al.,
as 1:2024cv11467
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $143,586.44 Seized from JPMorgan Chase Account Number XXXXX8228, Approximately $4,896.51 Seized from JPMorgan Chase Account Number XXXXX7633, Approximately $5,240.00 Seized from JPMorgan Chase Account Number XXXXX3817 and others
US v. Melendez-Orsini
as 24-1533
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL MELENDEZ-ORSINI, a/k/a Gelo, a/k/a Cerebro, a/k/a Primo
US v. Hernandez-Rodriguez
as 24-1534
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DINELSON HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
