Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Doe 2 v. Farrell, et al
as 23-1944
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT M. FARRELL, Clerk of Court - Boston Court, FRANCIS CASTILLA, Deputy Clerk and RACHAEL SPLAINE ROLLINS, U.S. Attorney
Lewis et al v. Howel et al
as 3:2023cv01497
Plaintiff: Timothy Lewis
Defendant: Tea, Inc., Maxim Howel, Scott Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Wong v. Crumley
as 1:2022cv12109
Plaintiff: Anthony Wong
Defendant: Jordan Crumley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: Lu
as 22-1324
Petitioner: FRIEDRICH LU
Respondent: PAUL LAPROCINA, JR., MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR., SCOTT KEVIN DEMELLO and others
Lu v. Laprocina et al
as 1:2021cv11493
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Defendant: Paul Laprocina, Jr, Michael J Lepizzera, Scott DeMello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lu v. Budd, et al
as 21-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee: KAREN LAFRAZIA, SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE, INC., KIMBERLY SUZANNE BUDD and others
Lu v. Budd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10352
Defendant: Daniel P Sullivan, David Fredette, Methunion Manor Cooperative Corp and others
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Monteiro v. Cormier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00046
Plaintiff: Joao Monteiro
Defendant: City of Pawtucket, Trevor Lefebvre, Daniel Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lu v. Stanton, et al
as 20-1843
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH STANTON, WALTER F. TIMILITY, LENA M. WONG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRIEDRICH LU
Doe v. Lincoln-Sudbury Regional School Committee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv11564
Defendant: Bella Wong, Sandy Crawford, Peter Elenbaas and others
Plaintiff: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?