Cases 151 - 160 of 842,938
Cervantes v. Swegles et al
as 3:2024cv02486
Defendant:
Troy Matthew Swegles and Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Susana Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Paz v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2024cv02479
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Paz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Curran v. Hall
as 4:2024cv03744
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Markia Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VPN Technology Holdings, LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
VPN Technology Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Fortinet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Good Clean Love, Inc. et al v. Epoch NE Corporation et al
as 2:2024mc00738
Plaintiff:
Good Clean Love and Vaginal Biome Science
Petitioner:
BPI Labs Inc
Defendant:
Epoch NE Corporation and Lawrence Luo
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Wright v. Harrisonburg Men's CCap/Diversion Center et al
as 7:2024cv00682
Defendant:
VDOC and Harrisonburg Men's CCap/Diversion Center
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wayne Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSELL v. USA
as 1:2024cv02825
Petitioner:
GINA RITA RUSSELL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LaHanse v. Abrahamsen et al
as 6:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. LaHanse
Defendant:
Erik Abrahamsen and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byers v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv04501
Respondent:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Petitioner:
Valenton B Byers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
