Cases 41 - 50 of 832,217
Ewing v. USA
as 4:2024cv00907
Petitioner:
David K. Ewing, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
Robert Charles Jones
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach, The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Aaron Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morales v. Villegas et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez Morales
Defendant:
Villegas, Benson, Jessica Rambur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATEL v. DEFENDANT "1" et al
as 2:2024cv07502
Plaintiff:
KARTIK PATEL
Defendant:
DEFENDANT "1", DEFENDANT "2", DEFENDANT "3" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BLOCKER v. STOWE et al
as 1:2024cv07485
Plaintiff:
KAREEM BLOCKER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN STOWE, MICHAEL KELLY and ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BanQu, Inc. v. Sarl
as 1:2024cv05020
Plaintiff:
BanQu, Inc.
Defendant:
Keurig Trading Sarl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
N. et al v. Department of Education et al
as 1:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
L. N. and B. N.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education and David C. Banks
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Zhengxu He v. Seritage Growth Properties et al
as 1:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Zhengxu He
Defendant:
Seritage Growth Properties, Andrea Olshan and John Garilli
Jones et al v. WynnPRO, LLC/DBA Promaxima Manufacturing
as 6:2024cv06418
Plaintiff:
William S Jones and Jones Eason Enterprise, Inc.
Defendant:
WynnPRO, LLC/DBA Promaxima Manufacturing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
