Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio matching "Creditors Interchange"
Cases 191 - 200 of 423
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv30105
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11155
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hospodar v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
as 3:2009cv01284
Plaintiff: Leslie Hospodar
Defendant: Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type: Contract None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04777
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00572
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01137
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rebhahn v. Creditors Interchange, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv01385
Plaintiff: Michelle Rebhahn
Defendant: Daniel Coronado, Mr. Youngman, Mr. Olesi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00530
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02485
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?