Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Blevins v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv01170
Plaintiff:
Terry Blevins
Defendant:
Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Donna (I) Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nasious v. Mueller et al
as 1:2009cv01051
Plaintiff:
John Nasious
Defendant:
Nancy Mueller, Barry Goldsmith, Paula Frantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Milyard et al
as 1:2009cv01041
Plaintiff:
Earl William Campbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Milyard, Floyd Pohlman, Gagen Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Webster et al
as 1:2009cv00961
Plaintiff:
Dana Cooper
Defendant:
Brian Webster, Fortunato, Beverly Dowis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savajian v. Milyard et al
as 1:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
Gregg Joseph Savajian
Defendant:
Milyard, Aristedes Zavares, Physicians Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kemp v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
Glenn H. Kemp
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Kevin Milyard, Beverly Dowis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nichols, et al v. United States, et al
as 09-1010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. ALLEN
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. NICHOLS
Defendant - Appellee:
LEYBA, Dr., M.D., HARVEY LAPPIN, John/Jane Doe, MICHAEL NALLEY and others
Crump v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv02828
Petitioner:
Norvell Webster Crump
Respondent:
USA and Bureau of Prisons, Agencie(s) of Administrations
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nichols et al v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv02064
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Nichols and Mark J. Allen
Defendant:
USA, Harvey Lappin, Michael Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. Stock et al
as 1:2008cv01597
Plaintiff:
Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Joann Stock, Joann (I) Stock, Gary Fortunato and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
